The CEFR Advantage
Developed by the Council of Europe, the CEFR's six-level scale (A1, A2, B1, B2, C1, C2) not only delineates language ability from basic to proficient levels but also integrates a spectrum of real-life skills across listening, reading, speaking, and writing for all European languages. Its influence stretches beyond Europe, impacting language teaching and assessment globally. An interesting fact is that the CEFR was the result of over a decade of research, reflecting a comprehensive understanding of language learning, teaching, and proficiency assessment. This is consistent with the original aspirations behind the Framework as described by Professor John Trim, one of the CEFR authors:
‘What we were aiming at was something which will be a common reference point that people working in different fields and people using it for entirely different things and in very different ways could refer to in order to feel that they were part of a common universe’ (Saville 2005:281).
ACTFL Proficiency Guidelines
The ACTFL guidelines, while widely respected in the United States, offer a more segmented view of language proficiency, with five main levels (Novice, Intermediate, Advanced, Superior, Distinguished) and sublevels within each. These guidelines emphasize performance and communicative competence, catering specifically to the American educational context. The ACTFL made a significant leap in language education by introducing the OPI (Oral Proficiency Interview), a standardized assessment tool that has been adopted in various forms around the world.
Canadian Language Benchmarks (CLB)
Canada's CLB, with its twelve benchmarks across Basic, Intermediate, and Advanced stages, provides a framework tailored to the linguistic integration of immigrants. It's designed to assess language proficiency in practical, everyday contexts, supporting Canada's multicultural ethos. The CLB's unique contribution to language assessment is its focus on “real-world” language use, making it a critical tool for immigration and citizenship processes.
Why CEFR Stands Out
Universality
The CEFR's structure is designed for global use, transcending European borders, and providing a common language for discussing proficiency that is recognized and respected worldwide. Its focus on ‘Can do’ statements, rather than technical elements of language, allows both students and recognizing organizations a clear assessment of language ability, whether it be in English, or any other language.
Depth and Detail
Unlike the ACTFL, which heavily focuses on communicative performance, or the CLB, which is tailored to the Canadian immigrant context, the CEFR offers a balanced approach that considers a wide range of language use scenarios, making it incredibly versatile. Its descriptors can be applied to all four language skills - Reading, Listening, Writing and Speaking.
Impact on Material and Test Development
The CEFR has influenced the creation of a vast array of teaching materials, courses, and exams designed to meet its standards. This ecosystem supports a consistent approach to language learning and assessment. Cambridge English participated in the early development of this standard, and all our Cambridge English exams are aligned with the levels described by the CEFR.
Adaptability
The CEFR is adaptable to various languages and contexts, making it an invaluable tool for educators and learners across the globe. Its levels serve as a benchmark for numerous language proficiency exams, such as the DELF/DALF for French and the DELE for Spanish, enhancing its practical utility.
#CommonEuropeanFramework #CommonEuropeanFrameworkOfReferenceForLanguages #CEFR #LanguageProficiency #ACTFL #ACTFLGuidelines #CanadianLanguageBenchmarks #CLB #GlobalStandard #LanguageAssessment #EducationalFramework #LinguisticGoals #ProficiencyDescriptors #InternationalImpact
Common European Framework, Common European Framework of Reference for Languages, CEFR, language proficiency, ACTFL guidelines, Canadian Language Benchmarks, global standard, language assessment, educational framework, linguistic goals, proficiency descriptors, international impact